Marco Rubio defends the middle exiled family saga

class = “html_module id =”%% 3A% 22The asset_id_Marco 20Rubio% 20%% 20son 20exiles% 20of% 22 “

Marco Rubio:” .. the child exiles’

“I will always be the child of exiles. “The part of speech Marco Rubio Senate victory on election night, Novemeber 2, 2010, where he speaks of being part of the exile community.

The Miami Herald

ID =

“storyBodyContent”> some trip from Cuba to the United States over 50 years has become a media storm this week when his son, Senator Marco Rubio, if I were asked in the history of immigration, and the experience of exile in order to promote successful political career.

R, Rubio acknowledged an error in the official website of the Senate, which erroneously stated that his parents “came to America after the inauguration of Fidel Castro “in 1959. His family is coming in 1956.

The Washington Post Thursday repeatedly and publicly accused of embellishing the story of his parents for political purposes.

Rubio said the Post article was “outrageous” and left a false impression.

“I did not lie about the date. I did not know, “Rubio told The Miami Herald, taking into account the immigration of their relatives in Cuba there occurred a half century and based his story an oral family history.

“It is not relevant to the central story,” he said. “The date does not add anything. It does not embellish anything. The date is less relevant than the experience, the experience of people who came here to make a better life and may never return. ”

Friday Rubio wrote a written response to the Post article, published on Politico, the Web site of the national policy.

The controversy took on a life of its own in the room of the nation as a political echo left and right sides gathered on the list if the vice presidential short was a liar or a victim.

In addition to the classic struggle between conservatives and liberals, the issue has become a starting point for immigration and just what constitutes a policy of “exile.” He also served as a reminder that any politician seeking higher positions were analyzed every word in a series of new non-stop fueled by blogs, Twitter and YouTube.

The

political scandal has also set fire to the Washington Post, because the documents the story of an inspired activist who says Rubio birth defect can not be -. became the subject of criticism from several national media

The first paragraph of the article in the Washington Post suggests Rubio said that “he was the son of exiles, told the hearing, the Cuban- U.S. forced to leave their beloved island, after “a tyrant”, Fidel Castro took power. “

But the story does not mention the word that makes Rubio made the statement.

To support the charge, the Post Office was taken from a 2006 speech in the House of Florida, where Rubio said: “In January 1959, a thug named Fidel Castro seized power in Cuba and countless Cubans have been forced to flee. … Today, their children and grandchildren are the Secretary of Commerce of the United States and several members of Congress … and soon, even the Speaker of the House of Florida. “

In his speech, Rubio said his parents fled the island and did not refer specifically only to those who left Cuba after Castro took power. Instead, in particular, said he was speaking “a community of exiles.” In other words: He spoke of all Cubans living in Miami

Regardless of when his parents came from Cuba, who were exiled because they were in the United States, specifically in Miami, in a community. soon felt that he could not return to their homeland.